There is lots of discussion around generative AI art and text.
Much of this discussion revolves around the concept that the AI models are rehashing ideas from human artists to make the generated content.
The problem with declaring this method of "creation through consumption" as morally dubious? That's exactly how humans create.
We observe, study, and learn. Then we go on to make our own things from what we've seen and heard.
I've found that I'm not a particularly original thinker. Rather, I'm a bit more of a subconscious remixer.
If I want to create interesting things, I need to consume interesting things.
I've heard that one of the biggest parts of a writer's job is to read. I think that's part of the reason why. Not only are we inspired by consuming things we enjoy, but it gives us "creative fodder" so to speak.
Maybe this isn't a universal truth, and some people are spinning up truly original ideas out of thin air, but I expect most of us subconsciously draw from the things we consume any time we create.
The key here is intent.
If I'm spying on my neighbor's lemonade stand to get ideas on how to steal their business, that's wrong.
If I happen to see their sign by the road, then 10 days later spontaneously decide to create a nearly identical sign without realizing I'm copying something I observed earlier, I think that's probably OK if not unavoidable.
Ultimately, being original is probably overrated and maybe impossible.
Much of this discussion revolves around the concept that the AI models are rehashing ideas from human artists to make the generated content.
The problem with declaring this method of "creation through consumption" as morally dubious? That's exactly how humans create.
We observe, study, and learn. Then we go on to make our own things from what we've seen and heard.
I've found that I'm not a particularly original thinker. Rather, I'm a bit more of a subconscious remixer.
If I want to create interesting things, I need to consume interesting things.
I've heard that one of the biggest parts of a writer's job is to read. I think that's part of the reason why. Not only are we inspired by consuming things we enjoy, but it gives us "creative fodder" so to speak.
Maybe this isn't a universal truth, and some people are spinning up truly original ideas out of thin air, but I expect most of us subconsciously draw from the things we consume any time we create.
The key here is intent.
If I'm spying on my neighbor's lemonade stand to get ideas on how to steal their business, that's wrong.
If I happen to see their sign by the road, then 10 days later spontaneously decide to create a nearly identical sign without realizing I'm copying something I observed earlier, I think that's probably OK if not unavoidable.
Ultimately, being original is probably overrated and maybe impossible.