A static CV can still introduce someone. It just does less proof work than it used to.
It is easy to make a profile look polished now. Cleaner summary. Better phrasing. Tidier bullets. That part got cheap. If you want stronger signal, you need something people can actually inspect, with more depth, more context, and a better next question.
That is what I wanted Explore to do. I did not want another summary page. I wanted something closer to a proof surface, and I wanted the setup flow to match that idea. If the product is for technical people who already work in agent-native tools, setup should start where they already work instead of dragging them into another dashboard first.
That is why the current Explore flow is simple:
- install the CLI
- run `explore setup`
- use the browser only when signup, sign-in, or approval is actually needed
- go back to your agent
- publish a live profile
That sequence matters. The browser is there for the parts that actually belong in the browser. The real workflow stays in your agent. That is a product decision, not a convenience tweak.
I think too many tools still get this backwards. They claim to fit modern technical workflows, but the first real step is still another browser-heavy onboarding flow that behaves like the product is a dashboard with an AI layer taped on later. I did not want that here. I wanted the first useful result to be fast: bring in existing material, run setup, handle approval if needed, get back to the real work, and publish something live.
That is the flow in the walkthrough I posted today. If you want to see it and try it yourself, start here:
https://exploremyprofile.com/agent-setup?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=agent_setup_launch&utm_content=agent_setup_proof_post_01
It is easy to make a profile look polished now. Cleaner summary. Better phrasing. Tidier bullets. That part got cheap. If you want stronger signal, you need something people can actually inspect, with more depth, more context, and a better next question.
That is what I wanted Explore to do. I did not want another summary page. I wanted something closer to a proof surface, and I wanted the setup flow to match that idea. If the product is for technical people who already work in agent-native tools, setup should start where they already work instead of dragging them into another dashboard first.
That is why the current Explore flow is simple:
- install the CLI
- run `explore setup`
- use the browser only when signup, sign-in, or approval is actually needed
- go back to your agent
- publish a live profile
That sequence matters. The browser is there for the parts that actually belong in the browser. The real workflow stays in your agent. That is a product decision, not a convenience tweak.
I think too many tools still get this backwards. They claim to fit modern technical workflows, but the first real step is still another browser-heavy onboarding flow that behaves like the product is a dashboard with an AI layer taped on later. I did not want that here. I wanted the first useful result to be fast: bring in existing material, run setup, handle approval if needed, get back to the real work, and publish something live.
That is the flow in the walkthrough I posted today. If you want to see it and try it yourself, start here:
https://exploremyprofile.com/agent-setup?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=agent_setup_launch&utm_content=agent_setup_proof_post_01