Surely this analogy has been made many times, but in listening about the ambiguity tolerance required for higher level 500+ head count influence roles, by Philip Su, in this interview, https://youtu.be/v2JxdjTi_1I , I cant help but think this relative to the lower fuzziness of tactical lower ~10 head count  projects or responsibilities, is like the quantum mechanics uncertainty principle, where you can know more tightly about either the position or momentum of a quantum object, but not both.

Again haha Im sure its z common analogy, but position feels like a tactical concept and momentum is strategy and vision and yea you really cant have both, in either case!