India's Public Distribution System at a Crossroads: Technological Reforms, Persistent Challenges, and the Prospect of a Decentralized Future

Executive Summary

India's Public Distribution System (PDS) stands as one of the largest food-based social safety nets in the world, representing a cornerstone of the nation's strategy for food security and poverty alleviation. Originating as a wartime rationing measure, it has undergone a profound evolution, transforming from a universal entitlement into a targeted, technology-driven, and rights-based framework under the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the modern PDS, examining its architecture, the impact of recent technological reforms, its tangible benefits, and its persistent critical failures. Furthermore, it undertakes a forward-looking analysis of a fully decentralized PDS model, exploring its potential architecture, advantages, and inherent risks.

The central finding of this report is that the PDS exists in a state of paradox. On one hand, a suite of ambitious technological reforms—including the end-to-end computerization of the supply chain, Aadhaar-based biometric authentication, the automation of Fair Price Shops (FPS) with electronic Point of Sale (ePoS) devices, and the landmark 'One Nation, One Ration Card' (ONORC) scheme—has successfully modernized the system's distribution arm. These interventions have yielded demonstrable benefits: food grain leakage has been dramatically curtailed from over 40% to a range of 8-22%, national portability has empowered millions of migrant workers, and last-mile accountability has significantly improved. The system proved its resilience as an indispensable lifeline during the COVID-19 pandemic, preventing widespread starvation.

On the other hand, this technologically advanced superstructure is built upon a flawed foundation. The report identifies critical failures that technology alone cannot resolve. Pervasive targeting errors, stemming from the use of outdated census data and administrative hurdles, continue to exclude millions of deserving households while including ineligible ones. The system's economic model is fiscally unsustainable, with a soaring subsidy bill and high operational inefficiencies. Most critically, the PDS is caught in a structural contradiction: its dual, and often conflicting, objectives of ensuring consumer food security and providing producer price support through Minimum Support Price (MSP) operations. This MSP-PDS nexus incentivizes the monoculture of wheat and rice, leading to severe environmental degradation in procuring states and a failure to address the nation's broader challenge of nutritional diversity and "hidden hunger."

Looking ahead, the report analyzes a hypothetical shift towards a fully decentralized PDS, where states assume complete operational and financial control. Such a model promises greater flexibility to cater to local nutritional needs, reduced logistical costs, and enhanced state-level accountability. However, it presents formidable challenges, including exacerbating inter-state fiscal disparities, creating unmanageable procurement and surplus disposal problems for food-deficit and food-surplus states respectively, and jeopardizing the maintenance of a national strategic food buffer.

The report concludes that the future of the PDS lies not in a simple binary choice between centralization and decentralization, but in a holistic reform agenda. Strategic recommendations include decoupling consumer subsidies from producer support mechanisms to address the system's core contradiction; diversifying the PDS food basket to include millets and pulses; adopting dynamic targeting methods to reduce inclusion and exclusion errors; and pursuing a phased, evidence-based approach to decentralization that builds state capacity while creating new national institutions for inter-state coordination and risk management. Only through such fundamental, structural reforms can the PDS transition from a technologically efficient yet flawed system into a truly effective instrument for comprehensive food and nutritional security for all Indians.

Part I: The Foundational Architecture of India's PDS

To comprehend the modern complexities, reforms, and failures of India's Public Distribution System (PDS), it is essential to first understand its historical evolution and the operational framework that defines the responsibilities of its key actors. The system's journey from a tool of scarcity management to a rights-based entitlement program reflects the broader shifts in India's political and economic landscape.

1.1 From Scarcity Management to a Rights-Based Entitlement: A Historical Overview

The PDS's evolution can be segmented into distinct phases, each mirroring the prevailing socio-economic philosophy of its time. This historical trajectory reveals that the PDS is not merely a food distribution scheme but a dynamic institution that has consistently served as a barometer of India's political economy.

Origins and Early Expansion (1939-1992)

The origins of the PDS trace back to the food rationing system introduced by the British during World War II in 1939, initially in Bombay and later extended to other cities and towns.1 Conceived as a wartime measure to manage scarcity and control prices, it was dismantled after the war but had to be reintroduced in 1950 following independence due to severe inflationary pressures.1 In its early years, the system was predominantly an urban phenomenon, heavily reliant on food grain imports, and used primarily as a price stabilization tool.2 This initial focus on urban areas led to a critique of an "urban bias" that persisted for decades.4

A pivotal moment came in the 1960s, in the wake of critical food shortages and the Green Revolution. The government established two key institutions that would form the bedrock of the PDS for decades: the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for procurement and stock management, and the Agriculture Prices Commission (now the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices) to recommend Minimum Support Prices (MSP).7 This marked a strategic shift from import dependency to domestic procurement, linking the PDS directly to agricultural price policy.2 Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, buoyed by increased agricultural production, the PDS expanded its reach into tribal blocks and areas with a high incidence of poverty, evolving into a universal scheme where, in principle, every citizen was entitled to subsidized food grains.7

The Shift to Targeting (1992-2013)

The post-1991 era of economic liberalization brought a new focus on fiscal discipline and targeted welfare, fundamentally altering the PDS's universal character. This ideological shift manifested in a series of policy changes. The Revamped Public Distribution System (RPDS) was launched in June 1992, with an area-specific approach aimed at strengthening the PDS in far-flung, hilly, and remote areas.7

A more decisive break from universalism occurred in June 1997 with the launch of the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS). This new model bifurcated the population into two categories: Households Below the Poverty Line (BPL) and Households Above the Poverty Line (APL).7 BPL families were entitled to food grains at specially subsidized prices, while the subsidy for APL families was reduced.5 This move was explicitly designed to focus the benefits on the poor while curtailing the government's escalating fiscal expenditure.2 The targeting was further refined in December 2000 with the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY), which aimed to identify the "poorest of the poor" among BPL families and provide them with food grains at a highly subsidized rate.5

The Rights-Based Era (2013-Present)

The final major transformation was catalyzed by years of public interest litigation and civil society activism, which reframed food security not as a government welfare measure but as a fundamental right. This culminated in the landmark passage of the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in 2013. The Act gave legal backing to the TPDS, converting entitlements into a justiciable right.7 The NFSA mandates coverage for up to 75% of the rural population and 50% of the urban population, providing them with highly subsidized food grains.13 This legislation represents the current phase of the PDS, where technology-driven implementation is used to deliver a legal entitlement to nearly 800 million people.16

The historical path of the PDS is a clear reflection of India's broader development narrative. Its initial form was a product of a state-led, centrally planned economy. The shift to targeting in the 1990s was a direct consequence of market-oriented reforms and fiscal prudence. The final move to a rights-based framework under the NFSA illustrates the growing influence of judicial activism and rights-based social movements in shaping public policy. Understanding this deep-seated political and economic context is essential for analyzing the motivations behind modern reforms and the persistent structural challenges that remain.

Period/Year | Scheme Name | Key Features | Target Group | Scale of Issue
1939-1960s | Rationing System / Early PDS | War-time rationing, primarily urban, import-dependent. | Initially universal in covered urban areas. | Fixed quantity of ration.
1970s-1992 | Universal PDS | Universal entitlement scheme, expansion to rural and tribal areas, focus on domestic procurement via MSP. | All consumers. | General entitlement, varied over time.
1992-1997 | Revamped PDS (RPDS) | Area-specific approach to strengthen PDS in remote, hilly, and inaccessible areas. | Residents of 1775 identified blocks. | Up to 20 kg per card.
1997-2013 | Targeted PDS (TPDS) | Two-tier pricing system, focus on the poor. | Below Poverty Line (BPL) and Above Poverty Line (APL) households. | Initially 10 kg/family/month for BPL, later increased.
2000-Present | Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) | Sub-scheme within TPDS to provide highly subsidized food to the "poorest of the poor". | Poorest of the poor households. | Initially 25 kg, increased to 35 kg/family/month.
2013-Present | National Food Security Act (NFSA) | Made food a legal, justiciable right. Subsumed TPDS. | Priority Households (PHH) and AAY households, covering up to 75% rural & 50% urban population. | 5 kg/person/month for PHH; 35 kg/family/month for AAY.

Source: Synthesized from 2

1.2 The Dual-Pillar Framework: Delineating Centre-State Responsibilities

The PDS operates under a framework of joint responsibility, with clearly demarcated roles for the Central and State Governments.11 This division of labor is fundamental to the system's functioning, from the farm gate to the beneficiary's household.

Role of the Central Government: The Central Government, primarily acting through the Food Corporation of India (FCI), bears the responsibility for the macro-level management of the food economy.17 Its key functions include:

Procurement and Price Support: Procuring food grains (mainly wheat and rice) from farmers at the Minimum Support Price (MSP).5
Storage and Buffer Stocking: Maintaining a central pool of food grains, which includes both operational stocks for monthly PDS requirements and strategic buffer stocks to ensure national food security and stabilize prices.1
Inter-State Transportation: Transporting the procured grains in bulk from food-surplus states (e.g., Punjab, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh) to designated FCI depots in every state across the country.5

Role of State Governments: State and Union Territory (UT) governments are responsible for the entire operational aspect of distribution within their respective jurisdictions, effectively managing the "last mile" of the supply chain.17 Their responsibilities include:

Beneficiary Identification: Identifying eligible households as per the criteria laid out under the NFSA (i.e., Priority Households and AAY households) and issuing them ration cards.5
Intra-State Allocation and Distribution: Lifting their allocated quota of food grains from central FCI depots and distributing it further down the supply chain to the network of Fair Price Shops (FPS).9
Supervision and Monitoring: Overseeing the functioning of FPSs to ensure that beneficiaries receive their entitled quantities at the correct prices.5
Augmentation: Many states choose to supplement the central PDS basket by procuring and distributing additional items of mass consumption, such as pulses, edible oils, iodized salt, and spices, often through their own civil supplies corporations.1

1.3 The Central Role of the Food Corporation of India (FCI)

Established under the Food Corporations Act of 1964, the FCI is the principal agency of the Central Government for executing its food policies.8 Its mandate is threefold: to provide effective price support to farmers, to procure and maintain buffer stocks for national food security, and to distribute food grains for the PDS and other welfare schemes.16 The FCI's operations are vast, involving the procurement of millions of tonnes of wheat and paddy annually, managing a massive network of storage godowns and silos, and coordinating the complex logistics of moving grain across thousands of kilometers from producing to consuming regions.7 The FCI is, therefore, the logistical and operational backbone of the entire PDS supply chain at the national level.

Part II: The Technological Metamorphosis of the PDS

Over the past decade, India's PDS has undergone a radical transformation, driven by a comprehensive and integrated technology-led reform agenda. This process has moved the system away from an opaque, manual, and leakage-prone operation towards a more transparent, accountable, and data-driven framework. These reforms were not implemented in isolation but as a series of interconnected building blocks, each enabling the next, culminating in a national, portable food security architecture.

2.1 End-to-End Computerization: Building the Digital Backbone

The foundation of the PDS's technological overhaul was the "End-to-End Computerization of TPDS Operations" scheme, approved in October 2012.25 The scheme's primary objective was to digitize the entire PDS value chain to improve efficiency, introduce transparency, and address systemic challenges like the diversion of food grains and the existence of fake or bogus ration cards.26

The scheme comprised several key components that were implemented across all States and UTs 18:

Digitization of Beneficiary Databases: This involved creating a centralized, digital database of all ration cards and the beneficiaries linked to them. This crucial first step enabled the correct identification of beneficiaries and laid the groundwork for eliminating bogus cards.18 As of recent data, 100% of the approximately 20.4 crore ration cards, covering around 80.6 crore beneficiaries, have been digitized.16
Computerization of Supply Chain Management: This component focused on the online, real-time tracking of food grain movement from FCI depots to state warehouses and finally to the Fair Price Shops. This system-generated allocation and tracking mechanism was designed to ensure the timely availability of grains and reduce diversion during transit.18 This has been implemented in 31 of 33 reporting states/UTs.25
Transparency Portals and Grievance Redressal: States were mandated to set up public-facing transparency portals where all PDS-related information, such as beneficiary lists and allocation details, would be available in the public domain. Concurrently, online grievance registration systems and toll-free helpline numbers were established to introduce public accountability and allow beneficiaries to report issues.18

2.2 Aadhaar-Enabled PDS (AePDS): Targeting Beneficiaries and Eliminating Ghosts

The integration of Aadhaar, India's 12-digit unique biometric identity number, was the next critical layer in the reform process. The Aadhaar-enabled PDS (AePDS) was designed to address the long-standing problem of "rightful targeting" by ensuring that subsidies reach only the intended beneficiaries.28

The core of this reform is Aadhaar seeding, the process of linking a beneficiary's Aadhaar number to their ration card details in the digitized database.29 This initiative has achieved near-universal coverage, with official data indicating that over 99.8% of ration cards and 98.7% of individual beneficiaries have been seeded with Aadhaar.16

The primary benefit of Aadhaar seeding has been the de-duplication of the beneficiary database. By using Aadhaar's unique identity feature, the system could identify and eliminate millions of duplicate and "ghost" (non-existent or ineligible) beneficiaries who were previously siphoning off subsidized grains. This cleaning of the database has resulted in the removal of approximately 5.8 crore bogus ration cards, leading to substantial savings in the food subsidy bill.28 This process is further strengthened by the ongoing e-KYC (electronic Know Your Customer) drive, which validates the identity of beneficiaries against their Aadhaar credentials.28

2.3 Last-Mile Revolution: The Impact of Fair Price Shop (FPS) Automation and ePoS Devices

The final and most crucial link in the technological chain is the automation of the Fair Price Shops, which represents the direct interface with the beneficiary. Nearly all of the country's 5.43 lakh FPSs (approximately 99.8%) have been equipped with electronic Point of Sale (ePoS) devices.16

These ePoS devices are not mere cash registers; they are integrated terminals that are connected to the central PDS server.26 Their functionality includes:

Biometric Authentication: When a beneficiary comes to collect their ration, their identity is verified through a fingerprint or iris scan against the Aadhaar database. This ensures that the food grains are delivered only to the entitled individual or a registered family member.26
Real-Time Transaction Recording: Every transaction is recorded electronically in real-time, capturing details of the commodities issued and the quantity. This eliminates the scope for FPS dealers to make fraudulent entries in manual registers or divert undistributed grains to the open market.26
Inventory Management: The devices help in maintaining an accurate, real-time record of the stock available at the FPS, which aids in efficient supply chain management.4

The impact of FPS automation has been significant. A study conducted in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana found that the introduction of ePoS devices, combined with the option for beneficiaries to choose any functioning FPS, led to a 6.6% increase in ration collection.34 To further enhance accuracy and prevent under-weighing, some states, like Delhi, are now moving towards integrating these ePoS devices directly with digital weighing machines.35

2.4 One Nation, One Ration Card (ONORC): Ensuring Portability and Food Security for a Mobile India

The culmination of these integrated reforms is the 'One Nation, One Ration Card' (ONORC) scheme, a transformative initiative that delinks a beneficiary's ration card from a single, assigned FPS.31 Launched in August 2019 and now implemented in all 36 States and UTs, ONORC leverages the digital backbone of the PDS to provide national portability of food security benefits.16

Under this scheme, the approximately 80 crore NFSA beneficiaries can access their entitled food grains from any ePoS-enabled FPS anywhere in the country.36 This is particularly beneficial for India's vast population of internal migrant workers, who previously had to forgo their PDS entitlements upon moving to a different state for employment.31

The system operates through the Integrated Management of Public Distribution System (IM-PDS) portal, which acts as a central repository for all ration card data and a clearinghouse for inter-state transactions.25 When a migrant beneficiary from Bihar, for example, authenticates themselves at an FPS in Maharashtra, the ePoS device verifies their identity and entitlement through the central portal. The transaction is recorded, and the system facilitates the financial reconciliation between the two states. The "Mera Ration" mobile app further supports beneficiaries by helping them locate nearby FPSs and track their entitlements.31 The scale of ONORC's success is evident from the more than 158.8 crore portability transactions recorded since its inception.16

The technological overhaul of the PDS is more than just a series of efficiency-enhancing measures. It represents a systemic integration where each reform builds upon the last. The digitization of ration cards was a prerequisite for Aadhaar seeding, which in turn was essential for biometric authentication via ePoS devices. This entire digital infrastructure was the necessary foundation for the national portability enabled by ONORC. This integrated ecosystem has fundamentally altered the power dynamics at the last mile of delivery. By giving beneficiaries the power of choice through portability, it has introduced a quasi-market-based competition among FPS dealers, who are now incentivized to improve their service to retain beneficiaries. This behavioral shift—from a passive recipient of state welfare to an empowered consumer—is arguably a more profound and lasting impact of the technological reforms than the quantifiable reduction in leakages alone.

Source: 16

Part III: An Assessment of Efficacy: Tangible Benefits and Systemic Gains

The comprehensive technological modernization of the PDS has yielded significant, measurable improvements in its functioning. These reforms have not only addressed some of the system's most chronic ailments but have also enhanced its role as a crucial social safety net, empowering beneficiaries and fostering innovation at the state level.

3.1 Plugging the Leaks: Quantifying the Reduction in Food Grain Diversion

One of the most significant achievements of the PDS reforms has been the drastic reduction in the leakage and diversion of food grains, a problem that had long plagued the system and undermined its credibility. Before the implementation of technology-driven reforms, estimates of leakage were alarmingly high. A study by the erstwhile Planning Commission suggested that in 2005, about 58% of the subsidized food grains issued from the central pool did not reach the intended BPL families due to a combination of identification errors and unethical practices.38 Other academic estimates placed the all-India leakage rate at around 42% in 2011-12.39

Following the end-to-end computerization and Aadhaar integration, these figures have seen a remarkable decline. Recent analyses based on the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) data indicate that leakages have fallen substantially, with estimates now ranging between 8.8% and 28%.39 This reduction translates into massive savings for the exchequer and, more importantly, ensures that a much larger proportion of subsidized food grains reaches the households it is meant for. The state of Telangana, for example, has explicitly credited its technological reforms for enabling the seizure of rice worth ₹409 crore that was being diverted from the PDS, showcasing the direct impact of these measures on curbing corruption.45

3.2 A Resilient Social Safety Net: The PDS in Times of Crisis

The strengthened PDS has proven its mettle as a robust and indispensable social safety net, particularly during times of national crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdowns presented an unprecedented challenge to food security, especially for the poor and migrant populations who lost their livelihoods overnight. In response, the government launched the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY), which provided additional free food grains over and above the regular NFSA entitlements.16

The existing PDS infrastructure was the backbone for this massive relief operation. The digitized beneficiary database and the automated FPS network enabled the swift and targeted distribution of approximately 1,118 Lakh Metric Tonnes (LMT) of food grains over 28 months, an intervention widely credited with preventing mass hunger and starvation.16 The 'One Nation, One Ration Card' scheme proved to be particularly critical during this period, allowing millions of stranded migrant workers to access their food entitlements from any FPS in the country, regardless of their home state.36 This demonstrated the system's newfound resilience and flexibility in responding to emergencies.

3.3 Empowering Beneficiaries: Enhanced Choice, Transparency, and Accountability

The reforms have fundamentally altered the relationship between the beneficiary and the PDS. The establishment of transparency portals and online grievance redressal facilities in all states has introduced a new level of public accountability.26 Beneficiaries are no longer passive recipients; they can now access information about allocations, check their entitlements, and register complaints through online portals or toll-free numbers, with mechanisms for escalating unresolved issues to senior officers.18

Furthermore, the combination of FPS automation and the ONORC scheme has empowered beneficiaries with choice. Previously, a beneficiary was tied to a single, often monopolistic, FPS dealer. Now, they have the flexibility to draw their rations from any functioning FPS of their choice.36 This has introduced an element of competition among FPS dealers, who are now incentivized to maintain regular hours, provide accurate quantities, and offer better service to retain their customer base. A study in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana confirmed this behavioral shift, noting that while most people still used their assigned shop, the mere existence of choice compelled dealers to improve their service.34

3.4 State-Level Innovations: Case Studies of Successful PDS Reforms

While the central government provided the legal and technological framework, the success of PDS reforms has often been driven by proactive and innovative state governments. Some states became models for reform even before the national rollout mandated by the NFSA.

The Chhattisgarh Model is a prominent example. The state undertook a series of bold reforms, including the de-privatization of FPSs, transferring their management to community-based organizations like Gram Panchayats, Self-Help Groups, and cooperatives.46 This move was designed to increase community ownership and social accountability. The state also pioneered doorstep delivery of food grains directly to FPSs, eliminating intermediary leakages, and used technology like GPS tracking on delivery trucks and SMS alerts to citizens to monitor the supply chain.47 These comprehensive reforms led to a dramatic reduction in leakages and a significant increase in beneficiary satisfaction, making Chhattisgarh a widely cited success story.40

The variation in performance across states underscores a crucial point: technology is a powerful enabler, but it is not a silver bullet. The central government's reforms provided the necessary tools, but the ultimate success of the PDS is determined by the political and administrative will at the state level to implement these tools effectively. States like Chhattisgarh and Odisha demonstrated that proactive governance could yield remarkable results even before the full suite of national technological solutions was available.40 Conversely, some states with historically better-performing systems have seen performance stagnate or even decline, suggesting that technology cannot compensate for a lack of administrative diligence.40 Therefore, the key differentiator in the success of the modern PDS is not the availability of technology, but the capacity and commitment of state governments to leverage it for effective governance.

Part IV: A Critical Appraisal: Persistent Failures and Unresolved Challenges

Despite the transformative impact of technological reforms on its delivery mechanism, the Public Distribution System remains beset by deep-seated, structural flaws. These challenges, rooted in the system's foundational design and policy objectives, cannot be resolved by technology alone and continue to undermine its overall effectiveness and long-term sustainability. A critical appraisal reveals significant failures in targeting, economic efficiency, nutritional outcomes, and environmental impact.

4.1 The Targeting Conundrum: Pervasive Errors of Inclusion and Exclusion

A primary and persistent failure of the PDS is its inability to accurately identify and cover all eligible beneficiaries while excluding the ineligible. Despite Aadhaar-based de-duplication, the system continues to suffer from significant errors of exclusion and inclusion.4

Exclusion errors, where genuinely poor and eligible families are left out of the system, remain a major concern. One of the primary causes is the reliance on the 2011 census data to determine the number of beneficiaries covered under the NFSA.39 This static cap means that millions of households that have fallen into poverty or have been newly formed since 2011 are not covered. The problem is particularly acute for migrant families and the urban poor, who often face administrative hurdles in obtaining or updating ration cards and lack the necessary documentation.39 Case studies from states like Odisha have highlighted how cumbersome administrative processes, especially for life events like marriage, can lead to the exclusion of women and children from their rightful entitlements, a problem that digitization has failed to solve.51

Simultaneously, inclusion errors, where ineligible or non-poor households possess subsidized ration cards, continue to strain the system.52 While technology has helped eliminate "ghost" beneficiaries, the misclassification of households remains a challenge, diverting scarce resources away from the most vulnerable.8

4.2 The Economic Burden: Analyzing High Fiscal and Operational Costs

The PDS operates at an enormous and escalating cost to the national exchequer. The food subsidy bill has become one of the largest components of the government's expenditure, projected to be ₹2.05 lakh crore for 2024-25 and potentially rising to between ₹4.1 lakh crore and ₹4.2 lakh crore in FY25.8

Beyond the absolute fiscal outlay, the system is plagued by profound economic inefficiency. A landmark evaluation by the Planning Commission found that for every ₹3.65 spent by the government on the PDS, only ₹1 of actual benefit reached the poor, indicating that nearly 73% of the expenditure was absorbed by administrative overheads, procurement costs, and leakages.38 The operational costs of the Food Corporation of India (FCI)—including procurement incidentals, storage, and transportation—are substantial.56

A major driver of this inefficiency is the policy of open-ended procurement at MSP. This policy compels the government to buy all grains offered by farmers (that meet quality standards) in certain states, leading to the accumulation of buffer stocks that are often far in excess of the strategic norms—sometimes as high as three times the required levels.39 Maintaining these excessive stocks incurs massive carrying costs (storage, interest, and administrative charges) and increases the risk of spoilage and wastage.58

4.3 The Nutritional and Environmental Paradox

The very structure of the PDS, which is intrinsically linked to the MSP regime, has created a paradoxical situation where the pursuit of food security has led to negative nutritional and environmental outcomes.

Nutritional Deficiencies: The PDS is overwhelmingly cereal-centric, focusing almost exclusively on the distribution of rice and wheat.8 While this model effectively provides caloric support, it fails to address the widespread problem of

"hidden hunger"—deficiencies in essential micronutrients like proteins, vitamins, and minerals.43 The system does little to improve dietary diversity, which is critical for comprehensive nutritional security. While some states augment the PDS basket with pulses or edible oils, and there is a recent central push for rice fortification, these are incremental measures that do not alter the fundamental grain-based focus of the system.16

Environmental Degradation: The MSP-PDS nexus has had severe, unintended environmental consequences. The guaranteed procurement of wheat and paddy at remunerative prices has incentivized farmers, particularly in states like Punjab and Haryana, to engage in intensive monocropping of these two water-guzzling crops.7 This has led to an ecological crisis in these regions, characterized by:

Rapid Groundwater Depletion: The water table in parts of northwest India has been declining at an alarming rate, with studies indicating a drop of 33 cm per year in the 2000s due to paddy cultivation.7
Deteriorating Soil Health: The continuous cycle of rice and wheat, coupled with the overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, has degraded soil quality.7
Air Pollution: The practice of burning crop residue after harvesting, particularly paddy stubble, to quickly prepare fields for the next crop contributes significantly to severe air pollution in North India during the winter months.62

4.4 The Digital Divide: When Technology Becomes a Barrier

While technology has been the primary driver of recent improvements, its implementation has also created new forms of exclusion. The reliance on digital infrastructure can become a barrier for the most vulnerable beneficiaries, leading to what can be termed "technology-induced exclusion." Key challenges include:

Connectivity Issues: In many remote, hilly, and tribal areas, poor or non-existent internet connectivity can render ePoS machines non-functional, preventing beneficiaries from accessing their rations.39
Biometric Authentication Failures: Aadhaar-based biometric authentication frequently fails for the elderly, whose fingerprints may be worn, and for manual laborers with calloused hands. This can lead to genuine beneficiaries being denied their legal entitlement due to a technological glitch.4
Administrative Complexity: The processes for e-KYC and updating family details in the digital database can be complex and inaccessible for individuals with low digital literacy, further exacerbating exclusion.39

These persistent failures reveal a fundamental structural contradiction at the heart of the PDS. The system is designed to serve two distinct, and often conflicting, political objectives: providing a food safety net for consumers and ensuring price support for producers. The MSP-led procurement model, politically crucial for farmer welfare, is the very mechanism that drives the system's major failures—the fiscal strain from excess stocks, the environmental damage from monocropping, and the nutritional deficit from a cereal-centric basket. The technological reforms, for all their success, have primarily optimized the distribution end of the chain. They have not addressed, and cannot address, the foundational problems originating from the procurement end. This reveals a system at odds with itself, where the consumer welfare goal is perpetually constrained by the producer support model. Any truly transformative reform must therefore address this central contradiction by rethinking the deep-seated linkage between PDS and MSP.

State | Leakage % (NSS 2011-12) | Leakage % (HCES 2022-23) | Percentage Point Change
Andhra Pradesh | 22.0% | 21.3% | -0.7
Assam | 50.7% | 25.9% | -24.8
Bihar | 24.4% | 25.4% | +1.0
Chhattisgarh | 9.3% | 36.2% | +26.9
Gujarat | 67.6% | 36.9% | -30.7
Haryana | 49.0% | 20.2% | -28.8
Jharkhand | 44.4% | 22.1% | -22.3
Karnataka | 34.7% | 17.0% | -17.7
Kerala | 37.1% | 35.3% | -1.8
Madhya Pradesh | 51.5% | 25.5% | -26.0
Maharashtra | 48.2% | 33.8% | -14.4
Odisha | 25.0% | 8.8% | -16.2
Punjab | 58.8% | -4.9% | -63.7
Rajasthan | 60.9% | 9.1% | -51.8
Tamil Nadu | 11.9% | 27.4% | +15.5
Uttar Pradesh | 57.6% | 23.6% | -34.0
West Bengal | 65.3% | 15.0% | -50.3
All India | 41.7% | 24.1% | -17.6

Note: Data represents estimates of food grain leakage. Negative values, as seen for Punjab, indicate potential data discrepancies or overestimation of consumption in surveys. The significant increase for Chhattisgarh may reflect changes in state policy or data anomalies between survey periods.

Source: 44

Part V: Envisioning a Decentralized Future: An Analysis of a State-Led PDS

As debates around PDS reform intensify, one of the most profound structural changes contemplated is a shift towards a fully decentralized system, granting states complete autonomy over their food security architecture. This section moves beyond an analysis of the existing framework to a hypothetical exploration of such a model, examining its conceptual underpinnings, potential benefits, critical challenges, and the necessary preconditions for its viability. This analysis reveals that decentralization is not merely an administrative reshuffle but a fundamental redesign of India's national food security paradigm.

5.1 Conceptual Framework for a Fully Decentralized PDS

In a fully decentralized PDS, the current model of joint responsibility would be replaced by one of state primacy. The core of this model would be the devolution of both operational and financial control to individual state governments.65

State Responsibilities: Each state would be empowered to design and manage its own food security program from end to end. This would include:
Procurement: Deciding which commodities to procure (e.g., local millets, pulses, in addition to or instead of wheat and rice), from whom to procure them (local farmers, open market), and at what price (state-determined MSP or market prices).65
Storage and Logistics: Managing their own buffer stocks and handling all intra-state storage and transportation logistics.68
Beneficiary Management: Continuing the responsibility of identifying beneficiaries and issuing ration cards, but with the freedom to set their own eligibility criteria beyond the NFSA floor.
Distribution Modality: Having the complete autonomy to choose the mode of subsidy delivery—whether through in-kind distribution via FPS, Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT) of cash, or food coupons/vouchers.39
Central Government's Role: The Centre's role would be significantly curtailed. It would likely transition from being an active operator to a facilitator and financier. Its primary function would be to provide a formula-based, conditional fiscal transfer to states to fund their PDS operations.66 The Centre might also retain responsibility for maintaining a smaller, purely strategic national buffer stock for managing large-scale, multi-state emergencies like severe droughts or floods.71

5.2 Potential Advantages of Decentralization

A state-led PDS model offers several compelling theoretical advantages that could address some of the current system's most entrenched problems.

Customized and Nutritionally Diverse Solutions: The greatest advantage would be the ability of states to tailor their PDS to local needs. States could procure and distribute grains and other food items that are locally produced and consumed, such as millets in Karnataka or coarse grains in Rajasthan. This would not only align the PDS basket with local dietary preferences but also significantly enhance nutritional diversity, directly addressing a key failure of the current cereal-centric system.66
Economic and Logistical Efficiency: Decentralized procurement would eliminate the enormous logistical exercise and associated costs of the FCI moving millions of tonnes of grain from a few surplus states across the country to deficit states. This would lead to substantial savings in transportation and handling costs and reduce transit losses.66
Enhanced State Accountability and Innovation: With full ownership of the system, state governments would be directly and solely accountable to their citizens for its performance. This could foster a climate of innovation and competition, encouraging states to develop more efficient and effective models, much like the early reforms in Chhattisgarh, which were driven by state-level political will.47

5.3 Critical Challenges and Inherent Risks

Despite its potential benefits, a move to full decentralization is fraught with significant risks that could threaten the very fabric of national food security.

Fiscal Disparities and Uneven Coverage: Indian states have vastly different fiscal capacities. Wealthier, industrialized states might have the resources to run robust and even expanded PDS programs. However, poorer states with weak revenue streams and high levels of poverty may struggle to fund adequate procurement and distribution, potentially leading to a "postcode lottery" where a citizen's right to food depends on the financial health of their state.66 This could exacerbate regional inequalities in food security.
The Procurement Dilemma in Food-Deficit States: Many states are net consumers of food grains. Kerala, for instance, produces less than 15% of its food grain requirement and is heavily dependent on the central pool.74 In a decentralized system, such states would lose their assured allocation from the FCI and would have to procure their entire requirement from the open market in surplus states. This would expose their populations to significant price volatility and require complex inter-state negotiations, a far more precarious position than the current system of assured supply.
The Surplus Management Dilemma in Food-Surplus States: Conversely, states like Punjab and Haryana, the traditional granaries of India, procure quantities of wheat and paddy far exceeding their own consumption needs.76 The FCI currently acts as a guaranteed buyer for this massive surplus. Without this national offtake mechanism, these states would face an insurmountable challenge of storing and selling these grains, which could lead to market price crashes, farmer distress, and a potential shift away from food grain cultivation, threatening national production levels.
Maintaining a National Food Buffer and Inter-State Coordination: A decentralized framework raises a critical question: who would be responsible for maintaining and deploying a national strategic reserve for widespread emergencies? Coordinating the release of stocks from multiple states during a crisis would be a logistical and political nightmare without a central authority. The current system functions as a massive, national risk-pooling mechanism, insulating individual states from catastrophic production shortfalls. Dismantling this without a viable alternative could leave the country vulnerable.71

5.4 Necessary Preconditions for a Viable Decentralized Model

A successful transition to a decentralized PDS would not be a simple act of devolution. It would require the creation of a new institutional and technological architecture to manage the inter-state dependencies that the FCI currently handles.

Robust Inter-State Trade and Governance Framework: The foremost prerequisite is the establishment of formal, barrier-free mechanisms for inter-state food grain trade. This would require clear agreements and a regulatory framework to ensure that deficit states have reliable access to the markets of surplus states without facing trade barriers or prohibitive costs.78
A Redefined Role for a Central Agency: The FCI, or a new central body, would need to be repurposed. Its role could shift from physical procurement and movement to that of a market facilitator, a financial intermediary for settling inter-state transactions, a provider of market intelligence, and the manager of a lean, strategic national emergency reserve.11
Integrated Technological Infrastructure: A common national technology platform would be indispensable. This platform would need to facilitate inter-state data sharing on production, stocks, and prices, manage a seamless financial settlement system for inter-state trade, and enable real-time tracking of food grain movement to ensure transparency and accountability across state borders.82
Asymmetric and Phased Decentralization: A "big bang" approach to decentralization would be perilous. A more prudent path would involve an asymmetric and phased rollout. States with demonstrated procurement capacity and fiscal strength could be moved to a fully decentralized model first, while the central government continues to support more vulnerable, food-deficit states. This would allow for learning and capacity building before a wider transition is considered.

The analysis of a decentralized model reveals that the PDS is more than just a collection of state-level schemes; it is a deeply interconnected national system. The food security of a consuming state like Kerala is inextricably linked to the agricultural and procurement policies of a producing state like Punjab. Therefore, decentralization is not a simple administrative choice but a fundamental redesign of India's national food security architecture that would necessitate the creation of a new set of national institutions to manage inter-state trade, finance, and risk.

Parameter | Current Centralized Model | Hypothetical Decentralized Model
Procurement Responsibility | Centre (FCI) procures at MSP and allocates to states. | States procure independently at state-determined prices or market rates.
Procurement Cost | Borne by the Centre (high due to MSP, statutory charges). | Borne by individual states; variable based on procurement strategy.
Buffer Stock Management | Centre (FCI) manages a large national operational and strategic buffer. | States manage their own buffers; Centre may manage a small strategic reserve.
Inter-State Logistics | Managed by FCI; high cost and complexity but ensures national supply. | Managed through inter-state trade; potentially lower cost but riskier for deficit states.
Financial Burden | High and centralized fiscal burden on the Union government. | Burden shifted to states; risk of fiscal stress in poorer states.
Nutritional Diversity | Low; primarily wheat and rice due to centralized MSP-led procurement. | High potential; states can procure and distribute locally relevant, diverse foods.
Accountability | Shared and often diffused between Centre and States. | High; states are directly and solely accountable to their citizens.
Key Risks | Leakage, inefficiency, fiscal unsustainability, environmental damage. | Fiscal disparity, supply insecurity for deficit states, surplus crisis for producer states, lack of national risk pooling.

Source: Modeled based on analysis from 65

Part VI: Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Public Distribution System in India has navigated a remarkable journey of transformation, evolving into a technologically sophisticated and legally mandated food security network of unprecedented scale. Yet, this evolution has brought into sharp focus a central paradox: the system has achieved remarkable success in optimizing its delivery mechanisms while leaving its foundational structural flaws largely unaddressed. It is a system simultaneously transformed and flawed, efficient in its operations but often ineffective in its ultimate outcomes. For the PDS to truly fulfill its mandate of ensuring comprehensive food and nutritional security for all, the reform agenda must now move beyond technological fixes to tackle these deeper, more complex challenges.

6.1 Synthesizing the Paradox of the Modern PDS: A System Transformed yet Flawed

The analysis presented in this report highlights the dual nature of the modern PDS. The successes are undeniable and significant. The end-to-end computerization, Aadhaar integration, and FPS automation have collectively slashed leakages, eliminated millions of ghost beneficiaries, and introduced a level of transparency and accountability that was unimaginable a decade ago. The 'One Nation, One Ration Card' scheme stands as a globally unique achievement in social security, providing a portable safety net for India's mobile workforce.

However, these technological achievements have been layered onto a system with inherent contradictions. The PDS remains tethered to an MSP-led procurement model that distorts agricultural patterns, causes severe environmental damage, and limits the food basket to a nutritionally inadequate offering of cereals. It operates with enormous economic inefficiency and places an unsustainable fiscal burden on the state. Furthermore, its reliance on outdated data for targeting continues to result in the exclusion of the vulnerable, while technology itself has created new barriers to access for the digitally marginalized. The PDS, therefore, is a technologically advanced superstructure built on a foundation that is structurally unsound.

6.2 Recommendations for Systemic Reform: Beyond Technology

To resolve this paradox, future reforms must be systemic, addressing the root causes of the system's failures rather than just its symptoms. The following strategic recommendations are proposed:

Decouple Consumer and Producer Subsidies: This is the most critical and transformative reform required. The objectives of ensuring consumer food security and providing farmer price support must be treated as distinct policy goals with separate instruments. The government should progressively move away from open-ended procurement for the PDS. Farmer support can be more effectively and less distortively provided through alternative mechanisms such as deficiency payments (paying farmers the difference between MSP and the market price) or direct income support programs. This would free PDS procurement from the compulsion of buying only MSP-supported grains from specific regions, allowing it to become more flexible, cost-effective, and responsive to nutritional needs.
Diversify the PDS Food Basket for Nutritional Security: The PDS must evolve from a program for caloric security to one for nutritional security. It is recommended that the central government mandate the inclusion of millets, pulses, and fortified edible oils in the PDS basket across all states. This should be supported by a policy of decentralized procurement, allowing states to purchase these additional commodities locally. This would not only improve the nutritional outcomes for beneficiaries but also support local agricultural diversity and create markets for smallholder farmers growing these crops.
Adopt Dynamic Targeting and Universal Coverage in Vulnerable Areas: The current static method of identifying beneficiaries based on the 2011 census is a primary cause of exclusion errors. India should move towards a dynamic targeting system that leverages real-time data from various government databases (such as income tax, electricity consumption, and vehicle ownership) to more accurately and frequently identify eligible households. For the most vulnerable populations, such as those in remote tribal areas or urban slums, states should be encouraged to adopt a universal PDS model, as practiced in Tamil Nadu, to eliminate exclusion errors entirely in these high-poverty zones.

6.3 A Phased Approach to Decentralization: Policy Pathways and Guardrails

Full decentralization, while theoretically attractive, carries significant risks. A prudent approach would be a phased and evidence-based transition that builds state capacity while establishing a new national institutional architecture.

Phase 1 - Strengthen and Expand the Decentralised Procurement (DCP) Scheme: The immediate focus should be on encouraging more states to adopt the existing DCP scheme. The central government should provide enhanced financial and technical support to non-DCP states to help them build the necessary infrastructure and administrative capacity for procurement, storage, and quality control. This would serve as a crucial first step in building state-level ownership and experience.
Phase 2 - Pilot Full Decentralization with a Fiscal Grant Model: The next step should be to launch a pilot program for full decentralization in a few willing and capable states. This pilot should include a mix of food-surplus and food-deficit states to test the model under different conditions. Under this pilot, the Centre would provide a fixed, untied fiscal grant to these states, allowing them complete autonomy over their PDS. This would serve as a real-world laboratory to test governance structures, inter-state trade mechanisms, and the fiscal implications of decentralization.
Phase 3 - Conditional National Rollout with a New Institutional Architecture: A wider, national rollout of decentralization should only be considered after the successful evaluation of the pilot phase and, critically, only after the establishment of a new national institutional framework. This framework must include:

A National Food Grains Trading Platform to facilitate transparent and efficient inter-state commerce.
A Central Clearinghouse for the financial settlement of inter-state transactions.
A clear charter for a repurposed central agency (like the FCI) to manage a national strategic reserve for emergencies, with well-defined protocols for contribution and withdrawal by states.

By adopting this sequenced and cautious approach, India can navigate the complex transition towards a more decentralized, efficient, and nutritionally sensitive Public Distribution System, ensuring that this vital safety net is truly fit for the challenges of the 21st century.

Works cited

6. Public distribution system in India-evolution, efficacy and need for reforms, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.fao.org/4/x0172e/x0172e06.htm
Public Distribution System (India) - Wikipedia, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Distribution_System_(India)
en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Distribution_System_(India)#:~:text=of%20the%20PDS-,1950%2D1997%3A%20Gradual%20expansion,owing%20to%20severely%20inflationary%20pressures.
Implementation of Technological Upgradation in Public Distribution System in India for Ensuring Availability, Accessibility and Affordability, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://oaji.net/pdf.html?n=2023/487-1714557920.pdf
Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) - Agriculture Notes - Prepp, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://prepp.in/news/e-492-targeted-public-distribution-system-tpds-agriculture-notes
Targeted Public Distribution System - Union Budget, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget_archive/es97-98/chap54.pdf
Public Distribution System - Drishti IAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper3/public-distribution-system-1
Public Distribution System: Evolution, Significance and Issues - PMF IAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pmfias.com/public-distribution-system/
Introduction, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2016/Chapter_1_Introduction_11.pdf
Difference between Public Distribution System (PDS) and Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) - BYJU'S, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/pds-and-tpds/
Public Distribution System (PDS) - government of india - NFSA, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://nfsa.gov.in/portal/PDS_page
Public Distribution System and Food Security - PRS India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://prsindia.org/files/policy/policy_analytical_reports/1388728622--TPDS%20Thematic%20Note.pdf
The Public Distribution System and Food Security in India - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6747310/
The Public Distribution System and Food Security in India - ResearchGate, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335628611_The_Public_Distribution_System_and_Food_Security_in_India
[Answered] Discuss the impact of the Public Distribution System (PDS) on the consumption patterns of households in India. How does it influence expenditure on non-food items? [250 words] |ForumIAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://forumias.com/blog/answered-discuss-the-impact-of-the-public-distribution-system-pds-on-the-consumption-patterns-of-households-in-india-how-does-it-influence-expenditure-on-non-food-items-250-words/
Year-End- Review of Department of Food and Public Distribution– 2024 - PIB, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2086345
Public Distribution System | National Informatics Centre | India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.nic.gov.in/project/public-distribution-system/
GUIDELINES FOR COMPUTERISATION OF TPDS Preface: Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) is operated under the joint responsi - S3waas, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s38bdb5058376143fa358981954e7626b8/uploads/2025/02/20250213872524799.pdf
Targeting and Efficiency in the Public Distribution System, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.isid.ac.in/~bharat/Research/epw_dutta.pdf
nfsa.gov.in, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://nfsa.gov.in/portal/PDS_page#:~:text=PDS%20is%20operated%20under%20the,grains%20to%20the%20State%20Governments.
Food Corporation of India - Drishti IAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.drishtiias.com/important-institutions/drishti-specials-important-institutions-national-institutions/food-corporation-of-india
Role of Food Corporation of India - Agriculture Notes - Prepp, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://prepp.in/news/e-492-role-of-food-corporation-of-india-agriculture-notes
Food Corporation of India (FCI) - UPSC Notes - LotusArise, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://lotusarise.com/food-corporation-of-india-fci-upsc/
Modelling supply chain network for procurement of food grains in India - ORCA – Online Research @ Cardiff, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/129293/1/Modelling%20supply%20chain%20network%20for%20procurement%20of%20food%20grains%20in%20India.pdf
Distribution of Food Grains (PD) | Official Website of Department of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Government of India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://dfpd.gov.in/distribution-of-food-grains/en
End-to-end Computerization of Public Distribution System (PDS) - Agriculture Notes - Prepp, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://prepp.in/news/e-492-end-to-end-computerization-of-public-distribution-system-pds-agriculture-notes
Department of Food & Public Distribution implemented a scheme on End-to-end Computerization of TPDS Operations in 31 States/UTs - PIB, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1703481
Centre committed to efficient and transparent Public Distribution System - PIB, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2074977
Aadhaar enabled PDS System (AePDS) – electronic Point of Sale (ePoS) - NIC Informatics, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://informatics.nic.in/uploads/pdfs/1413826f_Pds.pdf
Aadhaar Usage - Unique Identification Authority of India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://uidai.gov.in/en/17
One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) - NEXT IAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.nextias.com/blog/one-nation-one-ration-card/
One Nation One Ration Card - myScheme, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.myscheme.gov.in/schemes/onorc
E-POS IN PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: A STUDY ON THE CONSUMER PERCEPTION - IJRAR.org, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR19D2592.pdf
With ePoS devices, collection from ration shops up by over 6 per cent, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2025/Aug/09/with-epos-devices-collection-from-ration-shops-up-by-over-6-per-cent
Delhi to integrate ePoS devices with digital weighing machines at all fair price shops: Sirsa, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.thestatesman.com/cities/delhi-to-integrate-epos-devices-with-digital-weighing-machines-at-all-fair-price-shops-sirsa-1503456653.html
One Nation, One Ration Card - PIB, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/FactsheetDetails.aspx?Id=148563
ONORC (One Nation One Ration Card) | Controller of Rationing and Director Civil Supplies Mumbai, Government of Maharashtra | India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://controllerofrationing-mumbai.gov.in/scheme/onorc-one-nation-one-ration-card/
Performance Evaluation of Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), accessed on August 16, 2025, https://dmeo.gov.in/sites/default/files/2019-10/Evaluation%20Study%20on%20Targeted%20Public%20Distribution%20System%20%28TPDS%29.pdf
Key Takeaways from TCI's Meeting on the Future of India's Public Distribution System, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://tci.cornell.edu/?blog=key-takeaways-from-tcis-meeting-on-the-future-of-indias-public-distribution-system
Impact of the Food Security Act on Public Distribution System, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/poverty-inequality/impact-of-the-food-security-act-on-public-distribution-system.html
PDS Leakage Is Down, but There's a Catch - TCI - Tata-Cornell Institute, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://tci.cornell.edu/?news=pds-leakage-is-down-but-theres-a-catch
Rationalising Public Distribution System in India - ICRIER, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://icrier.org/publications/rationalising-public-distribution-system-in-india/
Towards an Efficient PDS in India - Drishti IAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/towards-an-efficient-pds-in-india
Declining PDS leakages: A look at the numbers - Ideas for India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/poverty-inequality/declining-pds-leakages-a-look-at-the-numbers.html
Telangana's PDS reforms a model for India: Secretary - The Hindu, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/telangana/telanganas-pds-reforms-a-model-for-india-secretary/article69369712.ece
The Public Distribution System: Problems and Prospects, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.kspp.edu.in/blog/the-public-distribution-system-problems-and-prospects
The Public Distribution System in India: Chhattisgarh to serve as a model state?, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://accountabilityindia.in/blog/the-public-distribution-system-in-india-chhattisgarh-to-serve-as-a-model-state/
The Chhattisgarh experience and the National Food Security Act - Ideas for India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/the-chhattisgarh-experience-and-the-national-food-security-act.html
Implementation of the Public Distribution System: An Empirical Analysis of the Right to Food in an Urban Slum - ScholarWorks@UARK, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jflp/vol12/iss1/7/
Persistent problems with PDS: An assessment of the Covid-19 ration scheme, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/poverty-inequality/persistent-problems-with-pds-an-assessment-of-the-covid-19-ration-scheme.html
Failures in the digitisation of India's food security programme: the exclusion of married women of Odisha | Privacy International, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/4468/failures-digitisation-indias-food-security-programme-exclusion-married-women-odisha
Identification of the Poor: Errors of Exclusion and Inclusion - ResearchGate, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228672016_Identification_of_the_Poor_Errors_of_Exclusion_and_Inclusion
Inclusion and Exclusion Errors | Download Table - ResearchGate, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Inclusion-and-Exclusion-Errors_tbl2_255708233
Government's subsidy burden to exceed budget estimates to Rs 4.2 lakh crore in FY25: BoB report - The Economic Times, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/policy/governments-subsidy-burden-to-exceed-budget-estimates-to-rs-4-2-lakh-crore-in-fy25-bob-report/articleshow/117512114.cms
Food subsidy accounts for over 50% of total Govt subsidy so far in FY25, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/industry/banking/finance/food-subsidy-accounts-for-over-50-of-total-govt-subsidy-so-far-in-fy25/articleshow/118268928.cms
Targeted Public Distribution System - World Bank Documents and Reports, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/820471468750260965/pdf/multi-page.pdf
Food Subsidy in India: Trends, Causes and Policy Reform Options Vijay Paul Sharma, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/5337679172012-08-02.pdf
Point of Sale Machines - PIB, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192118
What Are The Major Challenges Of The Public Distribution System (PDS) In India? How Can It Be Made Effective And Transparent? (150 Words, 10 Marks) - PWOnlyIAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://pwonlyias.com/pyq/what-are-the-major-challenges-of-the-public-distribution-system-pds-in-india-how-can-it-be-made-effective-and-transparent-150-words-10-marks/
Evaluation Study on Role of Public Distribution System in Shaping Household and Nutritional Security India - of Planning Commission, accessed on August 16, 2025, http://164.100.94.191/niti/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Final%20PDS%20Report-new.pdf
Reforming India's Public Distribution System (PDS) - ForumIAS community, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://forumias.com/blog/reforming-indias-public-distribution-system-pds/
Environmental and Health Effects Add Billions in Hidden Costs to India's Public Distribution System - TCI - Tata-Cornell Institute, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://tci.cornell.edu/?news=environmental-and-health-effects-add-billions-in-hidden-costs-to-indias-public-distribution-system
Lessons From the Aftermaths of Green Revolution on Food System and Health - Frontiers, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.644559/full
Schemes To Systems | The Public Distribution System: Anatomy of India's Food Subsidy Reforms - World Bank, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/02/21/schemes-to-systems-public-distribution-system
Alternative Food Grain Sector Policy Options - igidr, accessed on August 16, 2025, http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/PP-052.pdf
Decentralised procurement scheme 5.59 - Union Budget, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget_archive/es2004-05/chapt2005/chap514.pdf
Decentalized Procurement Scheme (DCP) |ForumIAS, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://forumias.com/blog/decentalized-procurement-scheme-dcp/
Decentralised Procurement Scheme - Arthapedia, accessed on August 16, 2025, http://www.arthapedia.in/index.php/Decentralised_Procurement_Scheme
Decentralized Foodgrain Procurement: A Localized Approach for Efficiency, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://agriculture.institute/indian-agricultural-development/decentralized-foodgrain-procurement-local-efficiency/
Procurement, Storage and Distribution of Foodgrains by FCI - Committee Reports, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/procurement-storage-and-distribution-of-foodgrains-by-fci
Buffer Stock Management: Involving private players - NCDEX, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://ncdex.com/downloads/Research/casestudies-conceptpaper/Buffer-Stock-Management_1.2.pdf
Buffer Stock Management - National Food Authority, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.nfa.gov.ph/programs-projects/buffer-stock-management
FISCAL HEALTH INDEX 2025 - NITI Aayog, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-01/Fiscal_Health_Index_24012025_Final.pdf
The PDS System in Kerala: A Review - | Centre For Civil Society, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://old.ccs.in/internship_papers/2008/PDS-in-Kerala-204.pdf
FOURTEENTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN (2022-2027) WORKING GROUP ON CIVIL SUPPLIES AND PDS REPORT PERSPECTIVE PLANNING DIVISION March 2022 - Kerala State Planning Board, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://spb.kerala.gov.in/sites/default/files/inline-files/Civil%20Supplies%20%26%20PDS-CDIT-%20FINAL.pdf
India's public distribution system: Replace or reform? - South Asia@LSE, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2012/10/12/indias-public-distribution-system-replace-or-reform/
Public food stockholding - FAO Knowledge Repository, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/36faf6b8-4c92-432b-8e1e-0653721ad3ef/content
Overview of Agriculture Trade Policy, Promotion and Logistics Development Division, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://agriwelfare.gov.in/en/AgricultureTrade
Indian Wheat and Rice Sector Policies and the Implications of Reform - Economic Research Service, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/45802/11584_err41_1_.pdf
The consequences of inter-state trade liberalisation for Indian farmers | VoxDev, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://voxdev.org/topic/agriculture/consequences-inter-state-trade-liberalisation-indian-farmers
Procurement Policy | Official Website of Department of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Government of India, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://dfpd.gov.in/procurement-policy/en
Augmenting Use of Technology in Implementation of NFSA-2013: - Indian Public Policy Review, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://ippr.in/index.php/ippr/article/download/302/125/453
Biometric Infrastructures and the Indian Public Distribution System - OpenEdition Journals, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/6459
Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Decentralized Blockchain Platforms, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2024/12/blockchain-technology-and-the-rise-of-decentralized-blockchain-platforms/
(PDF) Empowering Dataspace 4.0: Unveiling Promise of Decentralized Data-Sharing, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383107349_Empowering_Dataspace_40_Unveiling_Promise_of_Decentralized_Data-Sharing